In 2023, the Federal Court of Canada released its decision in Energizer Brands, LLC and Energizer Canada Inc. v. Gillette Company (2023 FC 804). The decision clarifies some of the laws applicable to ...
Trade marks are well worth protecting. Though comparative advertising and keyword bidding may be allowed, the restrictions ...
While advertisers are awaiting the Federal Trade Commission's revisions to the Green Guides, the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs continues to review environmental ...
Comparative advertising will no longer automatically be regarded as trade mark infringement. It is now a prerequisite for a trade mark owner to show that its mark is being used "as a trade mark" and ...
Going forward, the Ninth Circuit's ruling signals to plaintiffs that they will need to plead “something more” to show that interoperable software is a derivative work; it is not enough to show that ...
NIVEA prevails in trade dress dispute as Delhi High Court cements comparative advertising boundaries
In Beiersdorf v Hindustan Unilever – an infringement spat involving trade dress for cosmetic creams – the Delhi High Court has delved into the world of comparative advertising, disparagement and ...
Ranjan Narula and Shakti Priyan Nair of RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys examine how Indian law and recent court rulings have shaped comparative advertising and trademark disparagement in an ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results